Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 153

Thread: Biosecurity and the threat to the Aquarium Industry

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default Biosecurity and the threat to the Aquarium Industry

    TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN WITH IMPORTING ORNAMENTAL FISH.

    I am informing all readers of this email, that Biosecurity Australia has just finalized their draft on all imported Iridoviruses affecting all imported ornamental finfish in the varieties of all Cichlids, all Gouramis, and all Livebearers. They have had this on the watch for almost 3.5 years and have now released the final draft report to us on 23/7/10, and have given Industry until 23/8/10 to respond to their findings.

    Their final report recommends that all Cichlids, all Gouramis, and all Livebearers as well as all Betta spp, and paradise fish species are also in the batch-testing procedures and each will have to be batch-tested post arrival in Australia for a group of so-called megalocytiviruses all on the species mentioned above, and yet, there is no test for megalocytiviruses anywhere in the world and these viruses are not on the O.I.E. register as diseases of quarantine concern. They currently use a PCR test to determine if any imported species mentioned above have any of these megalocytiviruses attached to them. There is no mention in their very lengthy report about how much each batch would cost to be tested, but the old adage “user pays” will mean that the costs will be born by all Importers, and on every batch of the above mentioned species, not to mention the lose of the species removed for testing.

    That is a big problem for all Importers and for everyone within the Aquarium Industry, BUT, that is not the major shock. The problem lies in the fact that there is a sliding scale of how many species are removed for testing from each batch of fish that is imported. If an Importer brings in 20 Discus varieties, or 20 Frontosa species (at a minimum of 12cm) then the authorities will take away and test 19 fish from each batch. If you bring in 50 of any of the fish species mentioned, they will take away 35, if 100, they will remove 45, just to name a few. THIS KIND OF IMPOST WILL NOT BE ABLE TO BE BORN BY ALL SMALLER AND EVEN SOME LARGER IMPORTERS. If you want details log onto the following site, then scroll down until you see Appendix 5 where the sliding scale of batch-tested removal is shown. The site is http://www.daff.gov.au/ba/ira/curren...mental_finfish

    If this comes into being, there will be no importsof any Cichlid varieties as the cost would be too exorbitant for any Importer, and that would presumably include the two biggest Importers. So, in its application there will probably be no imports of Discus, Frontosa, Featherfins, Tropheus, Apistogramma, Neolamprologus or any dwarf cichlids for that matter, and just about all smaller operators will close their doors due to such heavy handed approach to our Industry by Biosecurity Australia. This is not the “slim edge of the wedge” it is the “thick edge of the wedge”, and could just about ruin this Industry altogether that have been importing fish for over 100 years, and worth in excess of $450 million P.A.

    The person from Biosecurity Australia that you need to contact is Dr. Ramesh Perrera and his email address is Ramesh.Perrera@biosecurity.gov.au and his telephone number is (02) 62724675 and you also need to send your responses to the Minister involved in this whole situation a Mr Tony Burke, and his email address is (now we are in election mode) Tony.Burke.MP@aph.gov.au in Canberra with his personnal email address being www.tonyburke.com.au and his office in Kingsgrove telephone no is (02) 95533800 and his fax no is (02) 95543504. You will need to send off emails, and faxes, and make telephone calls to these two people to make them aware of the damages that their Department (Biosecurity Australia) will do if these measures are implemented. These two people need to be aware of the very serious concern out in “the real world”, and how this will affect all Importers to Australia, and it is your livelihood that is in question here and your voice must be given to these people in order to get Biosecurity Australia to relent and come to the discussion table with Industry people so that a more reasonable outcome can be reached.

    Dr. Perrera in discussions with him admitted that this would be devastating for the Aquarium Industry, but that he had a job to do and was going to follow through on the implementation of these batch-testing procedures, even though it may close the doors of a number of Importers “by the stroke of a pen”. He did state that these same principles were recently applied to the Prawn Industry, where they were going to ban the imports of all Prawns and Prawn Products for human consumption, but mainly for Bait, as it was the Bait prawns that go directly into the Wild that could cause outbreaks of IHHNV, White Spot and Yellow Head diseases in the Australian environment, and it could these diseases in the fledgling Prawn Industry in Australia, until the Prawn Importers sent specimens from a locally produced farm to an overseas scientific laboratory to test them for IHHNV, and the other diseases mentioned, and it was soon found that these diseases were already within Australian waterways, and farms.

    The result was that once this information was supplied to Biosecurity Australia they soon backed off and did not go ahead with banning the import of Prawns and Prawn Products for both bait use and human consumption. The same will probably need to be done here in Australia, only there are a lot more species in our Industry that needs to be tested and quickly (with the operative word being quickly). Currently, at my latest update, is that PIAA our supposed Peak Industry Organisation, has applied for a lengthening of the time to respond cuurently listed as 23/8/10, in order to give the Industry more time to respond to this final draft report.

    Be aware that this will not stop here, as I predict that Goldfish, Tetras and others like Sharks, Barbs and Catfish may be next in line, if Biosecurity Australia is not stopped here, and if this happens we will all be out of work.

    IT IS NOW UP TO ALL OF YOU TO BEGIN SENDING YOUR EMAILS,FAXES, AND TELEPHONE CALLS to the two people mentioned above, regards Norm Halliwell.
    Fishchick Aquatics
    Shop 17 Annerley Arcade
    478 Ipswich Road
    Annerley QLD 4103
    www.fishchick.com
    ph: 07 3848 9585
    email: fishchick@gmail.com

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,626

    Default

    Is it just me, or does a period of one MONTH seem like a ridiculously inadequate period to prepare a reply?

    That sounds like it has 'Supreme Court Appeal' written all over it...
    Cheers,

    Rufus


    "I completely lost it. Well, okay, that sounded more awesome than what I really did, which was yell. And by yelling I mean sending a bunch of TEXT MESSAGES ALL IN CAPS!"

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Cairns
    Posts
    605

    Default

    Between this and upping the ante on new additions to the noxious list they seem really determined to extinguish the keeping of any non-native fish species. I could rant for a bit here but I've had enough politics at work this week and I'm sliding into weekend mode.
    Cheers,
    Matt

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Queensland Cairns
    Posts
    1,010

    Default

    The usual will happen every one will sit on there hands and let (what they think) every one else do some thing.
    The other out come will be every one complaining that there LFS is a rip off, because of the price rises.

    I am send my letter, SO GET OFF YOUR FAT BUTS AND DO SOMETHING, did I offend I was trying. Do IT.

    Bob

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Morningside Qld
    Posts
    5,119

    Default

    Well, letter writing has always been my forte, suffice to say though that in this instance I'm stuffed if I would know what to write. I can understand the industry getting up in arms about this possible scenario coming to pass & these clowns must surely be stopped or, at the very least, made to pull their moronic heads in to a reasonable degree, but what can we, as very small hobbyists who simply keep a few fish, say to them in order to protect our ability to still procure reasonably priced, imported tropical fish?

    If someone strings together a good 'un, care to share so we can all plagurise?
    Chardy sippin', bitter, twisted, sour 'ol cow. Do not let your fantasies run away with your capabilities .... you, boy, are NO match for my blow torch! Boguns, you just keep on rollin'

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Queensland Cairns
    Posts
    1,010

    Default

    It is not possible, it WILL happen, they have been working on it for years, just to make sure it goes through.
    Jodie can probably come up with a draft letter, or some one else might.

    I have been banging on about this and some other things Bio and AQIS are doing for years and as usual people think it wont happen, please don't fool your selves.
    Some people will come up with stories about why it wont happen. But if it dose, it is to late then isn't it. So do your bit.

    If it happens it will only do me good, the price of the fish I produce will increase. I don't want that to happen, the number of fish we can keep is to small all ready.

    Bob

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,626

    Default

    At the very least, I'd focus on: the shortness of time for the industry to prepare a reply; the size of the sample required for each batch's test (50-95%?! Fair go....); the lack of details on cost to the importer and, ultimately, the consumer; the lack of any clear evidence that megalocytiviruses are a threat to our ecosystems (aside from the fact that it sounds scary and ominous - cite the O.I.E. register as an authoritative source), and at the very least; the (reported) fact that there is currently no known test for presence of megalocytiviruses, which is supposedly their reason for introducing the testing.

    So basically: how do they justify implementing a requirement for a negative result on a test which doesn't exist....?
    Cheers,

    Rufus


    "I completely lost it. Well, okay, that sounded more awesome than what I really did, which was yell. And by yelling I mean sending a bunch of TEXT MESSAGES ALL IN CAPS!"

  8. #8

    Default

    Thanks fish chick I was waiting for this !
    This is the greatest Threat to our industry ever People have no idea what is currently happening and has been for years the problem is the states can not be dictated to by the commonwealth till now as the Biosecurity Act 2010 now over rides any act that is in place in any state so we are no longer protected by random discrepancies in state laws
    This now give the department huge powers to force people to comply to a "perceived threat" People Please Stand up and be counted call your local member and send off emails
    the industry body is toothless PIAA has not helped preferring the negotiation table to public advertising of the issues ??
    Darren

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North Sydney
    Posts
    2,778

    Default

    I agree this bio security is heavy handed, but hopefully local breeding industry will start up to take up the slack.
    Robert

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Queensland Cairns
    Posts
    1,010

    Default

    Unfortunately the fish AQIS takes from this will be killed as they do not have the space to keep them.
    Also there is buggar all protests getting through so it looks like a done deal.
    When Quarantine came in Neon Tetras were a 10 to 15 cent fish, after Quarantine they were a 80 cent to $1.00 fish, this will do the same.

    Bob

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Campbelltown, Sydney
    Posts
    2,988

    Default

    If its a done deal, i guess its a good idea to invest in the fish you want now and not after?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Queensland Cairns
    Posts
    1,010

    Default

    We are gathering fish now.

    Bob

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    790

    Default

    I for one hope that the fish get priced out of the reach of most n00bs. Fish are an undervalued commoditiy. We need to respect them.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Graeme sent me to the Naughty Corner!
    Posts
    8,158

    Default

    Are any stakeholders making an appeal to the Import Risk Analysis Appeals Panel? Is anyone here registered as a stakeholder?

    http://www.daff.gov.au/about/contact...appeal_process

    I hope the legislation doesn't go through as I would hate to see Jodi-Lea and others go out of business

    from another forum -

    Would be interested to here the opinions of Jodi and any other importers as to what the repercussion of this will be to us
    If this legislation is passed Jodi will close up shop and go back to science.
    M J.
    Last edited by MJay; 08-08-10 at 03:18 PM.
    He's not the messiah, he's a very naughty boy!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Townsville
    Posts
    326

    Default

    Does anyone have the original report/proposal that was sent to the government?

    If you do, please PM me. I might be able to help with this, but I need to see the document first hand. Playing Chinese whispers with something that so many feel passionate about is bound to result in a letter that's not quite up to scratch.

    Cheers,

    Owen

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •